The contract said no markup. It was 2%.

§7.2 of the terms said there was no markup on model prices. There was, and there had been since the margin shipped: 2 %, applied to every catalogue price by server/pricing.js. The price displayed in the app always included it. The contract said the opposite.

The clause now discloses the margin. The amounts charged do not change. This corrects a description, not a price, which is why it took effect immediately instead of after the §12.2 notice period. Waiting would have meant leaving a false statement standing on purpose. Requests that use your own API key are margin-free, which matches what the usage rows record.

Four more corrections in the same audit

§2 no longer implies that one provider serves most requests, and mid-request failover to another listed provider is disclosed. §13.4 is new: a consumer choice-of-law carve-out, because the old clause covered which court hears a dispute but not which law applies, and for a consumer that choice is void anyway.

SiliconFlow (CN) was listed under explicit consent. No consent screen exists, so that basis was unsupportable. It is now performance of the contract, with a paragraph that says China outright, and it is enforced in code: automatic failover excludes providers in China, so no prompt reaches one except by your own pick.

Failover is now described as routine, because the journal shows daily reroutes. Also fixed: the recipients table had been shipping as raw pipe characters, the two legal documents shared anchor ids so a link to one section landed on another, and the version number §12 refers to was not displayed anywhere.